Kwakiutl Ethnography. FRANZ BOAS. Helen. Codere, ed. Chicago & London: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, (publication date ). xxxvii + pp. Presents an unfinished Boas manuscript and selected publications in which the renowned anthropologist records his observations of such aspects of Kwakiutl. Get this from a library! Kwakiutl ethnography.. [Franz Boas; Helen F Codere].
|Published (Last):||22 February 2016|
|PDF File Size:||11.56 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kwakiutl Ethnography – Franz Boas – Google Books
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. This work was central to his influential argument that differences between races were not immutable.
The Mind of Primitive Man ends with an appeal to humanism:. Nineteenth-century historians had been applying the techniques of philology to reconstruct the histories of, and relationships between, literate societies. Boas was appointed a lecturer in physical anthropology at Columbia University inand promoted to professor of anthropology in As in his work on Alaskan needlecases, he now saw variation among Kwakiutl practices as the result of the play between social norms and individual creativity.
Having argued against the relevance of the distinction between literate and non-literate societies as a way of defining anthropology’s object of study, Boas argued that non-literate and literate societies should be analyzed in the same way.
His article “On Alternating Sounds”, however, made a singular contribution to the methodology of both linguistics and cultural anthropology. For Boas, this is just one example of the many times conquest or colonialism has brought different peoples into an unequal relation, and he mentions “the conquest of England by the Normans, the Teutonic invasion of Italy, [and] the Manchu conquest of China” as resulting in similar conditions.
SmithHerbert S. Its mere existence entitles it to a full share of our attention, and the knowledge of its existence and evolution in space and time fully satisfies the student. A comparable visual example would involve words for colors.
This distinction between science and history has its origins in 19th-century German academe, which distinguished between Naturwissenschaften the sciences and Geisteswissenschaften the humanitiesor between Gesetzwissenschaften the law – giving sciences and Geschichtswissenschaften history.
He also considered his earlier critique of evolutionary museum displays. For some, this distinction between two different kinds of societies explained the difference between history, sociology, economics and other disciplines that focus on people with writing, and anthropology, which was supposed to focus on people without writing. In order to apply these methods to non-literate societies, Boas argued that the task of fieldworkers is to produce and collect texts in non-literate societies.
The Critique of Racial Formalism Revisited”.
He also developed a research program in line with his curatorial goals: Museum”, provides another example of how Boas made broad theoretical claims based on a detailed analysis of empirical data. This is clearly not a function of individual accents; Brinton was not suggesting that some individuals pronounced certain words differently from others. For example, Boas originally defended the cephalic index systematic variations in head form as a method for describing hereditary traits, but came to reject his earlier research after further study; he similarly came to criticize his own early work in Kwakiutl Pacific Northwest language and mythology.
Boas’s work in physical anthropology brought together his interest in Darwinian evolution with his interest in migration as a cause of change. Kawkiutl background of my early thinking was a German home in which the ideals of the revolution of were a living force.
Boas began by remarking that “If you did accept the view that the present weakness of the American Negro, his uncontrollable emotions, his lack of energy, are racially inherent, your work would still be noble one”. He became the editor of the Journal of American Folklore inregularly wrote and published articles on folklore often in the Journal of American Folkloreand helped to elect Louise Pound as president of the American Folklore Society in wkakiutl Moreover, virtually all cultural anthropologists today share Boas’s commitment to field research involving extended residence, learning the local language, and developing social relationships with informants.
Boas also fought to prove that not all cultures progressed along the same path, and that non-European cultures, in particular, were not primitive, but different. One of the greatest accomplishments of Boas and his students was their critique of theories of physical, social, and cultural evolution current at that time.
During this period Boas made five more trips to the Pacific Northwest. Wilhelm Dilthey emphasized the centrality of “understanding” to human knowledge, and that the lived experience of a historian could provide a basis for an empathic understanding of the situation of a historical ethnoography. Thus, Boas’s student Robert Lowie once described culture as a thing of “shreds and patches”.
Putnam argued that showing late nineteenth century Inuit and First Nations then called Eskimo and Indians “in their natural conditions of life” would provide a contrast and celebrate the four centuries of Western accomplishments since All cultural forms rather appear in a constant state of flux Encouraged by this ehnography to self-criticism, as well as the Boasian commitment to learn from one’s informants and to let the findings of one’s research shape one’s agenda, Boas’s students quickly diverged from his own research agenda.
Race, Law, and the Case against Brown v.
Boas then no longer worked at the museum, but the museum did not want to return the bones. This focus did not lead Boas to seek to reduce all forms of humanity and human activity to some lowest common denominator; rather, he understood the essence of the human species to be the tremendous variation in human form and activity an approach that parallels Charles Darwin’s approach to species in general.
University of Chicago Press, Defending the Master Race: Boas was one of the most prominent opponents of the then-popular ideologies of scientific racismthe idea that race is a biological concept and that human behavior is best understood through the typology of biological characteristics. This is not an example of color-blindness—people can perceive differences in color, but they categorize similar colors in a different way than English speakers.
Ethnology of the Kwakiutl, based on data collected by George Hunt
Wallace Joseph B. Swanton who studied with Boas at Columbia for two years before receiving his doctorate from Harvard inPaul RadinRuth BenedictGladys Reichard who had begun teaching at Barnard College in and was later promoted to the rank of professor, Ruth BunzelAlexander LesserMargaret Meadand Gene Rthnography who defended her dissertation inalthough she did not officially graduate until when Columbia reduced the expenses required to graduateE.
I see no reason why frabz should not allow the Germans, Austrians, and Russians, or whoever else it may be, to solve their problems in their own ways, instead of demanding that they bestow upon themselves the benefactions of our regime. Stanley Hall ‘s interference in his research, yet in he was appointed as the head of a newly created department of anthropology at Clark University. In order to do this, Boas relied heavily on the collaboration of literate native ethnographers ethnograhpy the Kwakiutl, most often George Huntand he urged his students to consider such people valuable partners, inferior in their standing in Western society, but superior in their understanding of their own culture.
John Benjamins Publishing Company. Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural frannz Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems etgnography.
He went on to do field work with the indigenous cultures and languages of the Pacific Northwest.
Boas was especially concerned with racial inequalitywhich his research had indicated is not biological in origin, but rather social.