Buy History in Practice 2nd Edition (Hodder Arnold Publication) 2 by Ludmilla Jordanova (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low. Is history a subject that primarily appropriates its theory from other disciplines? In this lively and readable study, Ludmilla Jordanova examines the many. Review of Ludmilla Jordanova’s History in Practice and Truth in Historical Writing By Abbey Mikha 1 What is truth? Can truth truly set a historian and a human.
|Published (Last):||3 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||15.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jordanova is jotdanova feminist whose primary area of expertise is the philosophy and history of science. Philippa Levine, The Amateur and the Professional: Such high-mindedness certainly commands the ludmillq and admiration of this reviewer, but I wonder whether it carries so much weight and assent in the highly politicised wider world of usable pasts that Jordanova has so adroitly sketched for us elsewhere in the book?
It is as if the concept was in the back of her mind, she may have wanted to mention it, but uistory may have defeated her arguments. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Having so far largely focused discussion on Jordanova’s treatment of ‘public’, I would like now to devote the rest of my consideration of History in Practice to her treatment of ‘history’. Historical research is about collecting information, sorting it, and writing it into a compelling explanation that accounts for the partial nature of our evidence, and our partiality as researchers.
Moreover, they highlight another fast-growing, related trend which they call ‘polysensuality’:.
No trivia or quizzes yet. Sign In or Create an Account. This book is the first educational book I have read whilst as university, and while I admit I didn’t read all of it before I had to return it to the LIC, I think I got everything I could from it, which is a good thing, but Leonidas Argyros rated it liked it Jan 03, Historians argue about whose interpretation is most valid.
Jordanova also has a major issue with emotional writing.
Author’s response Back to reviews index. Read three chapters for uni! At the very least it sounds untidy – just so: Ludimlla, In Ludmulla of HistoryLondon, Pennsylvania State University Press, Click here to sign up. At this point, I want to follow the author’s own preference to avoid arguing out such issues in the context of extremes such as the Irving case.
History from below emphasizes that not only professional historians, but also ordinary people who are interested in the past of their families, communities, and organizations can contribute to the understanding of history.
History in Practice – Professor Ludmilla Jordanova, L. J. Jordanova – Google Books
After an ‘excursus’ into Public History ch. Directly related to this is the issue of ‘mediation’. Richard LeComte rated it liked it Apr 27, Her strength is in the detailed detached style in which she writes, and her weakness is in the obvious lack of emotion involved in her book. Why have certain fields, such as women’s history and Black history, generated such intense debate about their value and validity?
Carlos Aguirre and Paulo Drinot. Attention should therefore be focused on interpretation as much as on sources.
History in Practice 2nd edition
It didn’t excite me, but it did teach me something. Jordanova uordanova that the goal of completeness is simply impractical especially since as the world of scholarship expands there is more and more to read, but she does not consider that if the historian tries to be as truthful as possible, then another historian can take the information the first one has researched, and continue the research from there with the goal of completeness and truth in mind.
Quotes from History in Practice. I expected somewhat more insight out of this than I got. And therein lie its strengths. Moreover, it does so using a prose style whose conceptual crispness and clarity of exposition makes the book a genuine intellectual pleasure to read from cover to cover. Books by Ludmilla Jordanova.
Accordingly, a specific and welcome innovation of History in Practice, is the inclusion of a chapter dedicated to ‘Public Jjordanova. I disagree with her on the matter of reliability versus truth because there have been thousands of times throughout history when historians have emphasised reliability and yet were dishonest and truly selfish in trying to project their truth instead of the real truth.
She also does not mention her argument of reliability versus truth where it concerns world history. She has also, as never before in jordnaova genre of ‘history primers’, foregrounded the centrality of audiences, both within and without the academy, and sketched in some of the implications this ludmilal has for historians.
That being said is you have to do it, you could be a lot worse off than Jordanova. Hence she is underestimating historians and people who want to tell the story of history and of the world as it practcie happened. This leads Jordanova to discussion of ways in which museums not only satisfy curiosity about the past but also shape the very forms of the public’s curiosity, particularly by deploying unnecessarily crude models of causation and agency that are irresponsibly value-laden since they tend to operate within an idiom of heroes and villains.
See, inter alia, Michael Hunter ed.
History in Practice
Jordanova does not even mention one example where history was falsified. Some other historians have called these claims reliable but the three nations who were subjected to these atrocities continue on their plight in the memory of their martyrs and in their hope that their voices will jirdanova heard.
The following is one of many examples where historians were dishonest in history because they did not follow the ideal of truth rather they had their own agenda in mind.